UK Civil War? Or Something Else?

Russell Yorkshire

December 29, 2025

People keep calling what’s coming a civil war. It isn’t. That phrase is lazy, dramatic, and safely wrong. A civil war is countrymen turning on countrymen. That’s not the shape of this storm, and anyone still framing it that way is either naïve or deliberately squinting.

The real battle lines are already etched in pencil—you can see them if you stop listening to slogans and start watching patterns.

On one side are ordinary Britons: working, paying, complying, keeping the wheels turning while being told they’re "privileged," "problematic," or—my personal favourite—"the problem." They obey laws that increasingly seem optional for everyone else.

On the other side is the chaos created by decades of state failure. Borders treated like admin errors. Enforcement outsourced to vibes. Tens of thousands of undocumented men—overwhelmingly young, overwhelmingly male—dropped into communities with no consent, no integration, and no honest conversation. Not refugees fleeing warzones with families in tow, but a demographic reality that every serious country in history has treated with caution… except ours.

Add to that the combustible mix of imported sectarianism, parallel legal cultures, and ideologies that openly reject British norms while exploiting British tolerance—and suddenly the word tension feels like a lie told to children.

This won’t be Right versus Left. That’s theatre. When things fracture, the Left won’t be manning barricades—they’ll be peering nervously from behind the Right, asking for forgiveness and protection from the very people they spent years calling names. Principles melt quickly when reality shows up uninvited.

And hovering above it all is the most dangerous question of the lot—one no politician wants to answer out loud: when order breaks down, who do the institutions side with? The citizen who plays by the rules? Or the disorder their own policies created? History suggests states rarely choose courage first.

So where do the police and the army land when the shouting stops and reality takes over?

Not where activists think. Not where hashtags point. And not where politicians say they will in press conferences written by frightened interns.

The police will land where they always do—caught in the middle, constrained by politics, paralysed by optics, expected to hold the line with one hand tied behind their back. Individually, most officers will side instinctively with order, with the public, with the law as it’s supposed to work. Institutionally, they’ll hesitate—because modern policing has been trained to fear accusation more than collapse. Enforcement will be uneven, cautious, and delayed. By the time it’s decisive, the damage will already be done.

The army is different. The army doesn’t do symbolism. It doesn’t do slogans. It doesn’t kneel to narratives. Its loyalty is not to governments of the day but to the state itself—law, continuity, and ultimately the Crown. If the army is ever deployed internally, it won’t be to referee culture wars or protect political vanity projects. It will be to restore order, secure infrastructure, and stabilise the country.

And here’s the uncomfortable truth no one wants to say out loud: when it comes down to it, the army will stand with the state’s survival and the population that sustains it. Not with imported disorder. Not with parallel rule sets. Not with chaos dressed up as grievance.

That’s the moment when the illusion collapses—when those who spent years chanting that borders don’t matter suddenly realise that force, authority, and allegiance still do. And they always have.

This isn’t fear-mongering. It’s pattern recognition. Britain isn’t sleepwalking toward a civil war—we’re stumbling toward confrontation born of denial, imported conflict, and elite cowardice. The tragedy isn’t that people didn’t shout loudly enough.

It’s that too many pretended not to see it at all.

© Russell Yorkshire, 2025

Image - Wikimedia Commons / Montecruz Foto

What’s your view?

Scroll down and leave a Comment using the comments form below

and have your say.

User names are fine.

Or

Use the Get in Touch form at the very bottom of the Home Page

and write a letter for our Reader’s Remarks Page.

You will need to include your name, address and contact details.

Only your name, city/town and county/country will be published

and we can withhold these if you ask.