The UK Countryside Is Too White

Jim Chimirie

February 3, 2026.

The wrong people, in the wrong numbers, in the wrong place. Solitude is suspect. Pubs are "problematic." Dogs are a "barrier." Englishness itself is quietly reframed as a form of hostility."

There is a new belief taking hold among Britain's institutions, and it is as dangerous as it is dishonest. The countryside, we are told, is "too white." Not green. Not rural. Not historic. White. And therefore a problem to be fixed.

This is not satire. It is official policy. Government-commissioned reports now describe England's hills, fields, pubs and footpaths as a "white environment" that risks becoming "irrelevant" unless it is reshaped to reflect a "multicultural nation." Rural authorities are instructed to attract specific ethnic groups, redesign access, rewrite interpretation, adjust behaviour, and rebrand culture itself. All paid for by the taxpayer.

This is not about access to nature. No one is barred from walking in the countryside. There are no gates marked by race. What is being objected to is not exclusion, but presence. The wrong people, in the wrong numbers, in the wrong place. Solitude is suspect. Pubs are "problematic." Dogs are a "barrier." Englishness itself is quietly reframed as a form of hostility.

Once again, the pattern is familiar. First the language. Then the targets. Then the money. Culture is recast as a flaw. Continuity becomes "dominance." History is reduced to optics. And the group that built, sustained and preserved these places is told – politely, bureaucratically – that it must adapt or move aside. What makes this moment different is that the countryside was never in crisis.

Cities were transformed by pressure, density, and policy failure. The countryside was stable. Rooted. That stability is precisely why it is now being targeted. It stands as a rebuke to the idea that constant demographic churn is inevitable or desirable. So it must be corrected. This is demographic engineering, not conservation. The state has decided that England's national landscape reflects the wrong story, and that story must be rewritten.

Marketing is altered to show the "right" faces. Outreach is targeted at the "right" groups. Behaviour norms are revised. The land remains, but the meaning is changed. We are told this is because "we all pay for it." But that argument collapses on contact with reality.

If something truly belongs to everyone, you do not single out one group as a problem and instruct it to change.

You do not racialise shared space. You do not treat existing culture as a barrier to be dismantled. That is not inclusion. It is displacement by policy. The same logic now runs through housing, planning and migration.

New towns dropped onto villages. Farmland sacrificed. Infrastructure ignored. Numbers driving everything, consent nowhere. The countryside is no longer a living inheritance but a blank surface onto which officials project social outcomes.

And notice the asymmetry. One group must always adapt. One culture must always soften, explain itself, dilute itself. The others are affirmed, accommodated, reassured. That alone tells you this is not about fairness. It is about power.

Once you accept that England itself is a racial problem, nothing is safe. Not villages. Not landscapes. Not history. What survives only does so until the next report declares it "unrepresentative." The countryside does not need re-education. It does not need racial quotas, rewritten customs, or academic lectures about who belongs.

It needs defending because when the state decides a country's heartland is "too white," it has already decided the country itself must change. And once continuity is broken, it does not return.

© Jim Chimirie, 2026

Image via author

The UK has always been a green and pleasant land. The British have always been dog-lovers. Our history, heritage and traditions are ours.

Not yours.

If you don't like this,

please make your way to the nearest airport or seaport and leave.

Kevan James

I'm a country bumpkin. Anyone who tells me our beautiful English countryside is too white and complains about too many dogs can, quite simply, fuck off. This bollocks needs to be ignored. No one, NO ONE, should ever apologise or feel wrong because of their skin colour. And our countryside is not racist. It is open to everyone. If those who don't like dogs or don't drink or prefer the towns and cities feel the countryside is hostile, stay away. Simple.

Kathryn Hall

They have ruined the towns - now they are planning to ruin the countryside.

They will not be happy until the UK is completely transformed and its history obliterated.

Kathy Parr

Hear! Hear!  

These attempts at social engineering have to stop.

Diana Harding

And who exactly is the person at the top orchestrating this horrible evil plan.

Christina

The uncomfortable truth, Christina, is this: there isn't a single puppet-master at the top. That's precisely why it's so effective. What we're seeing is an institutional machine – departments, quangos, NGOs, consultancies, and activist academics – all pulling in the same direction because they share the same assumptions.

Diversity targets. Equality frameworks. "Inclusion" mandates. Funding incentives. Career risk for dissent. None of it requires a mastermind. It runs on autopilot.

Ministers come and go. The doctrine stays. Civil servants commission the reports. Consultants write the language. Councils implement it.

Anyone who objects is labelled a problem and managed out of the way. It's a system that rewards demographic engineering and penalises resistance.

That's why it appears everywhere at once: housing, planning, education, the countryside – all moving in the same direction, without ever being put to a vote.

Jim Chimirie

I always resonate strongly with what you write Jim….and you’ve even chosen a photo of a place close to my heart. Helford on the Lizard Peninsula in Cornwall.

Further to what you have said, the very word England means land of the English.

Therefore to erode “Englishness” from our nation is to erode the very essence of thousands of years of history and culture. It’s wrong, and always will be wrong. Even non natives moving here would rather England stay the way it is - isn’t that what attracted them in the first place? Our unique culture? Isn’t that what makes every country in the world unique, every country brings something special to the world?

That kind of Diversity is a strength, but if we lose being mainly homogeneous as a nation, or as nations plural, then we lose the wonderful diversity of cultures and languages and ways, that each individual nation brings.

To become one big convoluted mess without a distinct & respected culture is a weakness.

It brings confusion and loss of a sense of our true home & loss of a sense of belonging as a United nation.

But this all does seem to be very deliberate. It’s like we are being systematically rendered apart by forces that know it will make Britain weaker as a whole.

The Kalergi Plan lays it all out. We are in the throes of it, unfortunately. As you say, there’s no walls or any barriers stopping anyone from visiting or enjoying the countryside.

But to push the narrative that it’s “too white” is plainly wrong and actually more about pushing an agenda than it is those in charge really caring about who does or doesn’t go to the countryside.

They don’t really care, they only care about destroying cohesion which gives us strength and weakens their push for the demolition of homogeneous societies.

Deby Ould

What’s your view?

Use the Contact Form below

and have your say.

User names are okay.

Or

email our Letters Page

Your name, Town or City and County of residence

are required.

These can be withheld from publication if you ask.