Shamima Begum - The Facts.

Russell Yorkshire

January 2, 2026

Let’s strip the drama out of this and deal in facts.

Shamima Begum did not make an innocent mistake. She made a conscious decision to leave the UK and join ISIS. By 2015, ISIS was universally known for mass murder, beheadings, sexual slavery, ethnic cleansing, and terror attacks across Europe and the Middle East. This was not hidden knowledge. It was headline news. She knew exactly what she was aligning herself with — and went anyway.

That choice carries weight.

This isn’t about hatred or revenge. It’s about responsibility, accountability, and the limits of tolerance in a functioning state.

The UK already struggles to control its borders. Illegal Entry is badly managed, removals are slow or non-existent, and enforcement is inconsistent at best. Ordinary citizens are repeatedly told to accept this as the new normal. In that context, the idea that someone who voluntarily joined a proscribed terrorist organisation might be allowed back into the country feels less like compassion and more like institutional self-sabotage.

Citizenship is not a get-out-of-jail-free card. It is a legal and moral contract. When you deliberately side with a group that murders civilians — including your own countrymen — you don’t get to later invoke the protections of the society you rejected when it suited you.

National security is not an abstract talking point. It’s operational reality. Bringing someone like Begum back would mean constant surveillance, intelligence monitoring, police resources, legal oversight, and long-term risk management — all paid for by a state that already cannot cope with the volume of illegal entrants it has allowed to build up. This isn’t theoretical harm; it’s measurable cost and risk.

And precedent matters — hugely.

If this case succeeds, it sends a clear signal: ideological betrayal has no lasting consequences. Radicalise, embed yourself in extremism, and if it ends badly, the system will find a way to cushion the fall. That is not justice. That is weakness dressed up as virtue.

Now let’s deal with the misinformation — because this is where the public is being deliberately misled.

Recent headlines about the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) have been wildly sensationalist. Words like “intervened” and “overruled” are being thrown around to create outrage and clicks. None of that reflects reality.

Here are the facts:

Begum has lost all her appeals in the UK courts;

The next procedural step available to her is an application to the European Court of Human Rights;

The court has not accepted the case, not ruled, and not ordered the UK to do anything;

All it has done is request the UK government’s position — a routine preliminary step before deciding whether a case is even admissible.

That’s it.

This is not Strasbourg “stepping in”. It is not Britain being overruled. It is not an imminent return. And if the case proceeds at all, it would likely take years before being heard. The idea that something dramatic has already happened is a fiction created by lazy headlines and amplified by social media outrage.

On X, people have rushed to attack the ECHR without understanding the difference between procedure and judgment. Asking for information is not siding with the applicant. It’s how courts function. You don’t have to like the system to understand how it works.

But none of this changes the central issue.

Begum chose to align herself with a group at war with British values, British allies, and British lives. UK courts have repeatedly upheld the government’s assessment that allowing her back would pose a security risk. That position is not extreme — it is precisely what a state is meant to do.

A country that struggles to control who enters must at the very least be uncompromising about who does not return.

That isn’t cruelty.

That isn’t hysteria.

That is the bare minimum of common sense.

© Russell Yorkshire, 2026

Image via the BBC

What’s your view?

Scroll down and leave a Comment using the comments form below

and have your say.

User names are fine.

Or

Use the Get in Touch form at the very bottom of the Home Page

and write a letter for our Reader’s Remarks Page.

You will need to include your name, address and contact details.

Only your name, city/town and county/country will be published

and we can withhold these if you ask.