Remigration - Yes or No?

Pete North

May 14, 2025.

There's been some debate has to how we would go about remigration.

Some favour an umbrella phased approach, but I think you have to look at the individual cohorts and design bespoke policies for each.

I've already looked at asylum and illegal immigration, where I believe hostile environment measures are more effective than "mass deportations". Still, though, this will not be enough. You need to go much farther to tackle entrenched immigration. Integration is a fashionable topic at the moment, but integration measures, if they are to be at all effective, are not all the dissimilar to hostile environment measures.

Banning non-stun slaughter, for instance, forces Muslims to decide whether their religious identity comes ahead of their British nationality. A case for going much further with this can easily be made, with a view to remigration rather than integration. Anyone who has seriously examined integration as a concept knows it's a non-starter. The only true integration is marriage to a native. How extensive those measures need to be are a matter for debate. They certainly need to be robust if we're going to get a grip on Islamism and sectarianism.

We are going to have to put British Muslims on notice. I think, though, that there are more deep-rooted problems, especially when it comes to Britain's black population. Many of the problems have developed in the last thirty years through a combination of welfarism and fatherlessness, progressive education and affirmative action, through which young black people have grown up believing they are uniquely victimised and entitled to special treatment.

This is largely at the behest of white middle class liberals who, as we all, are among the worst humans on earth. As such we're going to need a complete overhaul of education and welfare policies. It's going to take time to undo a lot of the damage. I do wonder, though, if it may already be too late. Some are far too feral to ever reintegrate into a civilisation. A quick glance at manifestations of black culture in Britain tells you that (Not least Notting Hill Carnival. A murderous equivalent to Glastonbury for black urbanites).

As such, a modest proposal I'm toying with is "Operation Reverse Windrush," a remigration strategy to encourage Caribbean communities in the UK to voluntarily leave the UK by offering international development grants to Caribbean states and whole-family emigration grants. This can be framed as a mutually beneficial move.

Black people are always telling us how racist Britain is. Since they don't like it here, and we don't like having them here, or the endless slaughter on our streets, we can all agree that it's time to fix it once and for all.

Firstly, we need a new British Nationality Act which explicitly excludes Windrushers and their descendants. A new act could redefine residency rights while offering incentives for voluntary departure. This would, however, require the consent of recipient countries. This would be an appropriate use of foreign aid. The UK government could partner with Caribbean nations to fund infrastructure or education initiatives, conditional on accepting returning families. Grants for families could cover relocation costs, housing, and initial living expenses, potentially £10,000-£20,000 per family, based on historical migration resettlement programs.

This could even be framed as reparations for Britain’s historical role in Caribbean dysfunction. This could involve a formal apology for colonial exploitation, paired with a fund for Caribbean development, administered through an international body. Meanwhile, on the domestic front, we should look to promote a "Caribbean Zionism" concept, creating a cultural movement where Caribbean communities see returning as a form of empowerment and self-determination.

This could be done through a multi-channel media campaign. We could partner with Caribbean diaspora influencers and media outlets (e.g., The Voice newspaper in the UK) to promote stories of successful returnees. Ad campaigns could highlight improved quality of life, using slogans like "Reclaim Your Roots, Rebuild Your Future." There is nothing stopping us leveraging the leftist decolonisation narrative by framing the UK as a historically oppressive environment for Black communities, while positioning the Caribbean as a place of opportunity.

Workshops in community centres could educate families on Britain’s colonial impact. We can offer workshops on the benefits of returning, with testimonials from Caribbean governments promising support, such as job placement programs. This effort could also have its own strand of hostile environment measures such as enforcing rules on playing music on public transport without headphones.

A clampdown on serious antisocial behaviour would mainly affect London's black community. "Operation Reverse Windrush" could be executed through a mix of legal reforms, cultural campaigns, and economic incentives, with remigration centers facilitating the process. The key is ensuring voluntary participation, leveraging historical narratives, and securing international cooperation. While costly, the long-term benefits - reduced migration pressures in the UK and economic growth in the Caribbean could justify the investment, provided it’s implemented with transparency and sensitivity.

Since black people are telling us at every opportunity that life in Britain is unpleasant for them, it's time we listened. They don't want to be here, we don't want them here, and everything would be better for all concerned if they weren't here. Since their economic and social contribution to the UK is minimal, little would be lost by attempting it.

© Copyright Pete North 2025

What’s your view?

Scroll down and leave a Comment using the comments form below

and have your say.

User names are fine.

Or

Use the Get in Touch form at the very bottom of the Home Page

and write a letter for our Reader’s Remarks Page.

You will need to include your name, address and contact details.

Only your name, city/town and county/country will be published

and we can withhold these if you ask.