Has Badenoch Steadied the Tories - Or Not?

Henry Hill

October 31, 2025

A couple of days ago, John Rentoul of the Independent website highlighted this handy chart from Wikipedia, a sort of progress bar for the current Parliament combined with a polling summary:

His point, and certainly the most striking takeaway from the most recent months, is that there has been a clear and substantial shift from Labour to the Greens since the summer – one large enough to put the latter within touching distance of pushing the Liberal Democrats into fifth place.

But our focus is on what Conservatives should make of it. Dan Hodges offers a set of observations CCHQ would probably be happy with:

“…three other main takeaways: a) Clear evidence Kemi Badenoch has finally staunched the bleeding. b) Further clear evidence Reform have plateaued. c) No evidence Labour has reached its floor under Keir Starmer. If anything, the collapse is accelerating.”

It is certainly better for the Tories that their polling has stabilised than had it continued on the sharp downward trajectory it was on until June – and given that the recent relationship between their polling and Reform UK’s stands out as clearly as Labour’s to the Greens’, Reform plateauing is likewise a good sign.

But the picture painted by the whole chart is still, I think, very bleak – and not just because we’re almost a month on from the Party Conference in Manchester and despite that being widely held to have gone pretty well, and a sense that the Conservatives have been on the front foot several times in the weeks since, there seems as yet to be no sign of any polling bounce off the back of it.

(Kemi Badenoch had a good conference; it boosted her standing with the membership and quieted chattering about her leadership. But as I wrote previously, conferences are for party leaders much longer on risk than reward; a bad one can precipitate disaster, but a good one tends merely to avoid it.)

The other problem with any attempt at a rosy interpretation of the polling is simple: that if Badenoch has “staunched the bleeding” she has staunched it at well below the point she started at, and that the bleeding itself began pretty much the moment she became leader.

From the aftermath of the general election up until last November, the Conservatives were recovering at about the same rate as Reform was rising. Yet that was the only period in this parliament when the Opposition seemed to be actually benefiting from the precipitous collapse of the Government’s support; since then, Labour’s freefall has continued but the Tories have dropped around seven points, and are now bumping along with poorer numbers than they posted at last year’s existentially bad election.

It would almost certainly be unfair to pin the blame for this entirely on the leadership. One of the big problems the party faces in this parliament is getting media attention, and last year’s leadership contest had the effect of keeping the media engaged and making the Party a story in the relatively quiet summer months. (One suspects this had much to do with last year’s conference having that slightly manic do-they-know-they’re-out-of-power edge to it.)

Nonetheless, if Badenoch’s team would want her to accrue any credit from improving the Party’s poll position in future – and they would – or indeed for “staunching the bleeding”, then she has too to own the other side of the coin.

Looking at the chart again, we can see two distinct phases in the decline of the Conservatives’ polling: a period from last November to around March this year when it lost momentum and started shadowing Labour’s downward trajectory, and then a more precipitous fall between March and June which is mirrored by a surge in Reform’s share. What explains this?

There are doubtless several theories, but I fear that it shows in part the price the party is paying for one major misjudgement on Badenoch’s part: the decision to go slow on policy and focus the early part her leadership on internal matters on the basis that the next election was years away.

It’s not that there was no logic to this idea, and indeed we might well be much better off if political and media life still operated at that pace. But it doesn’t. Badenoch took the helm of a party which was slowly recovering but faced, for the first time in modern history, the serious prospect of being overtaken by a challenger to its right. The correct tactical response, however we might deplore it philosophically, ought to have been a frenzy of activity aimed at keeping the Tories in the spotlight and ahead of Farage.

Instead, the Party all but disappeared from the national conversation for months – to such an extent that maintaining the Conservative focus of our morning newslinks turned into something of a challenge, as there were many days with only one mention of the Tories and no few with none at all.

This will, inevitably, have given more space to Farage and his plague-on-both-your-houses message, which would explain why the Conservatives started shadowing the Government’s falling ratings. This in short over delivered Reform UK its long-awaited crossover moment, and it was only a couple of months after this that we see the second, more dramatic decline in Tory fortunes as Reform cannibalises their vote to surge ahead of Labour – perhaps reflecting a dividend for Farage of addressing the perennial credibility problem (‘they can’t win’) faced by all challenger parties.

Other explanations are probably available, and there is of course no guarantee that all these lines won’t rearrange themselves (perhaps several times) between now and the next election.

But leadership is accepting that the buck stops with you, and when you get down to the numbers, the big question for Badenoch and her supporters is why she inherited a party polling at 25 per cent and has “staunched the bleeding” at 18 per cent – and done this in the context of a continual and precipitous collapse in the Government’s own numbers.

© Henry Hill / Conservative Home 2025

What of the Longer Term?

Kevan James

One thing that has never been mentioned (at least as far as I know) is what a realistic aim for the Conservative party in the longer term might be. There is of course, the obvious, to win the next General Election. That however may not happen. In this case, what then? Again the obvious; to resume in opposition.

There is a chance that Labour will, at some point, collapse in disarray before 2029 and if they do, are the Conservatives ready? The answer is no. Neither is Reform UK but it is likely that they will win and Nigel Farage will become PM. But if Labour last the distance (and don't find a spurious excuse to 'postpone' the GE) they are still, in my view, doomed to finish in third or even lower.

If one again assumes a win for Reform UK, (and once more this is merely my take), they will not last a full term, another five years further on until 2034. The reasons are very simple;

Nigel Farage has never been an MP until now. Apart from Lee Anderson, neither have his closest supporters. Of those around him, there are a number of former Tories, all of whom can be described as failures. All indelibly associated with a 14 year period that saw the Tories descend into collapse (Labour's biggest claim to fame is doing the same in only a year). Why would people want what would in effect be a re-run of 2011 to now?

Those ex-Tories may well be Reform UK's biggest Achilles Heel. That aside, the complete lack of know-how could well result in a very short-term government. In this instance, Badenoch's task is to ready her party to return to government not in 2029 but fairly soon thereafter.

Present polls - which don't forget, are notoriously inaccurate - elevate the Greens higher than they will be. The party has become a refuge for the disillusioned left and will not come close to second. The Liberal Democrats are increasingly being seen as a joke. Labour will continue to slide. So the opening is there.

Kemi Badenoch was right to take the stance she has over policies; right to learn something from the defeat of the last election and right to take her time. She does now need to up her game considerably however and she is clearly growing into her role as leader and potential Prime Minister. What she needs, and soon, are new candidates in place to stand as Conservative MPs, drawn from people with life behind them, years of working at ordinary jobs and paying their bills - and their taxes.

With plenty of new blood on offer (including and especially at CCHQ), whilst she may not do it by 2029 or earlier, under her leadership, the Conservatives will do better than predicted at the next GE - whenever it comes - and be ready to resume in government thereafter.

© Kevan James 2025

What’s your view?

Scroll down and leave a Comment using the comments form below

and have your say.

User names are fine.

Or

Use the Get in Touch form at the very bottom of the Home Page

and write a letter for our Reader’s Remarks Page.

You will need to include your name, address and contact details.

Only your name, city/town and county/country will be published

and we can withhold these if you ask.